Testing monetary exchange rate models with the Westerlund panel cointegration test
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
The Impact of Monetary Regime on the Exchange Rate Pass-Through under Exchange Rate Volatility (Dynamic Panel Data Approach)
متن کامل
Cointegration, Fractional Cointegration, and Exchange Rate Dynamics
Multivariate tests due to Johansen (1988, 1991) as implemented by Baillie and Bollerslev (1989a) and Diebold, Gardeazabal, and Yilmaz (1994) reveal mixed evidence on whether a group of exchange rates are cointegrated. Further analysis of the deviations from the cointegrating relationship suggests that it possesses long memory and may possibly be well described as a fractionally integrated proce...
متن کاملthe impact of monetary regime on the exchange rate pass-through under exchange rate volatility (dynamic panel data approach)
متن کامل
A panel cointegration approach to the estimation of the peseta real exchange rate
In this paper we estimate different specifications of a model for the determination of the bilateral real exchange rate of the peseta relative to nine European Union members. The model is based on Meese and Rogoff (The Journal of Finance 43 (1988) 933) monetary approach as extended by MacDonald (Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money 8 (1998) 117). The applied econom...
متن کاملThe Impact of Monetary Regime on the Exchange Rate Pass-Through under Inflationary Environment (Dynamic Panel Data Approach)
The main objective of this paper is to investigate the effects of monetary regime (countries with inflation targeting monetary policy versus countries with exchange rate anchor) on the extent of exchange rate pass-through over the period of 1999-2010. To achieve this objective, the econometric model has been estimated by Dynamic Panel Data approach and Arrelano- Bond (AB) method. The empirical ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Economica
سال: 2020
ISSN: 2560-2322,1585-6216
DOI: 10.47282/economica/2014/7/2/4345